Through the magic of 'Petticoat Discipline Monthly' (now Quarterly) we have in the past few years been able to learn how much more extensively this technique has been utilized than one might realize. And that, as each day passes, it has become more and more prevalent.
Mothers, aunts, sisters, and many recipients themselves have sent in letters by the dozens, and a careful reading of these letters can only leave one with the feeling that the technique indeed does work - and, the technique being the control of a male’s behavior by helping him to learn to appreciate some of the finer things in life, and in this case the finer thing in particular being the feminine world and attitudes, and its associated mode of dressing.
Males from the offset have been known for their aggressive, and some times belligerent, behavior. It’s pretty much bred into them. They have to be competitive, and of course, their clothing was pretty much the result of their daily activities. Even when men wore aprons, like a blacksmith, it was a heavy leather apron: a heavy garment certainly designed for utilitarian purposes, and not looks and enjoyment.
However, in the modern age, and certainly given the utilization of new technologies, the workplace is constantly changing. Men often find themselves working alongside women, with both sexes doing the same things. No longer is there a need for their more aggressive attitudes and adversarial approaches. Thus their inherent instincts and training, more often than not, have caused them more troubles than they possibly deserve.
Concerned mothers and other relatives, usually sisters or aunts, have been desirous of bringing about an appropriate redevelopment of their daily approach to new life styles, and they have done this by dressing these males in a more feminine way.
However, in order to do this, it is most often done as a punishment, with little evidence of loving gestures. Various changes are either forced upon them or induced in the form of a new life style.
No question, it works. How could it not? You take a male and force him to dress as a girl and parade him in front of his peers, and he will most certainly be embarrassed, humiliated and made to feel mortifyingly effeminate, and a complete failure as a male.
He has no recourse but to act as much like a girl as possible in order gain acceptance in his new stature. Consequently, he now acquires the appropriate attitudes, and becomes the type of person that was deemed an improvement by the women and girls around him. Thus the effort is pronounced a success. Are congratulations in order?
What we don’t know is what other psychological effects have taken place. Have we done any non-repairable harm to him? Have we taken away his competitive nature? Have we severely curtailed his future? Have we accomplished what we set out to do? - and that is, made him a better person? Is there a better way?
And we like to believe it is the technique of utilizing petticoat pleasure, rather than petticoat punishment. It’s a more subtle approach and it’s more difficult. It requires a certain amount of imagination and planning. It requires love and patience and it certainly takes a bit longer to accomplish. But maybe the results are worth it. And, why would that be so?
Well for one thing it’s always better to get someone to do something because they want to, as compared to being forced. There is no better way to achieve their complete co-operation. With co-operation it becomes pleasurable. It becomes fun. It’s enjoyable. The results have to be good.
But, is it obtainable? We believe it is, for the following reasons. Let's suppose one is forced to undergo some form of petticoat punishment. Frequently after a male has had this experience, and even though they were not in agreement with the action, they would then begin to have desires to have it repeated. Why this is so, is hard to say. Apparently, the experience can be somewhat addictive. To what extent this occurs is hard to determine, because in cases where this does not happen, it is hardly likely to be reported in the literature, at least not in the letters sent to 'Petticoat Discipline Quarterly'. At any rate it gives rise to the belief that an enjoyment of petticoating can be developed. The trick is, "How this can be brought about, and done in an enjoyable and beneficial way?”
For some it can simply be the opportunity to look nice, and to be admired, which are the desires of most females. It can be caused by the softness and smoothness of various fabrics. It might be certain colors, the soft pastels in particular. Ruffles, frills, and lace decorating the ladies' 'unmentionables' most often play a big part in accomplishing the good feelings sought after. Wearing of clothing utilizing these elements can be exciting and thrilling. Why is the wearing of special female underclothing so exciting, and in particular why is it so exciting even when it is not shown or apparent, and yet just knowing the pretty undies are there can be enjoyable. Females have learned this many centuries ago, so why couldn’t it be appropriate for males?
Apparently being forbidden to do something can, or does, have a lot to do with making it a really enjoyable experience. Males have been told from their earliest years that a liking for feminine clothing and interests is tantamount to being a 'sissy', or one of many other derogatory names. And that, therefore, they should not do it. Real men just don’t do that sort of thing. So when one wears something feminine and gets away with it, it becomes a daring accomplishment. It can be exciting, and of course pleasurable. It can be fun, and - who knows? - maybe it even meets some basic needs for warm softness and femininity in the male.
As said, the real trick is creating a situation where in the recipient of this treatment is lead into this activity in a way that does not insult or tread upon his sensitive feelings. Forcing can result in an adverse reaction, and build up a belligerent response. It may not be all that apparent, and may not even show itself until some time in the future. But nevertheless it may be there, and can cause future problems or resentment. After all, if one needs to be forced into this life style, then it is easy to assume it is not desirable, and should be avoided.
This can be contrasted with a more willing acceptance, which will be more likely bring about a bond of appreciation, and all because it was an enjoyable and pleasurable experience.
Beyond punishment there are many ways this can be accomplished. Particularly when associated (as indicated) with a loving and caring approach.
It could be as simple as placing an impressionable male in the company of many females. If in due time, if they treat him like one of the group, then it’s possible he will want to be perceived the same as they are and will accept and mimic their behavior and be more willing to accept their dress codes. Probably even desire it.
A more fascinating approach may be to use one item at a time, and just building up an acceptance with use. How one is introduced to each item can be most provocative. It certainly can be challenging and fun for all involved. And, it may stimulate your imagination!
The final, beneficial, result being that the male begins to accept feminine ways and the desired attitudes hoped for. How does the song go? “Why can’t a woman be more like a man?” Or, in this case, "Why can’t a man be more like a woman?"
There must be many ways that this can be accomplished. The challenge is to bring it about in the most adventurous, enjoyable, and exciting manner.
First send your letters to 'Petticoat Discipline Quarterly' telling us whether or not you agree with the ideas expressed here. If you do, please add any insights of your own. It would be most interesting to hear how you would go about making it happen. If you don’t agree, please feel free to tell us, and perhaps explain why you disagree. We stand to be enlightened. If the response warrants it, I will present a story or technique a friend told me about, as to how his being petticoated was made to happen. To me it was a fascinating story, and I can attest to the fact that he became a better person because of it.