Hello Miss Susan,

I just wanted to drop you a line to let you know how much my mistress enjoyed your website, "Petticoat Discipline Monthly". She just fell in love with it the moment she saw it.

My mistress/girlfriend and I discovered your site while web surfing one evening, and it has literally changed my life. Janice, my mistress/girlfriend, has been using petticoat punishment on me for almost three years now, but has always dressed me as a woman my own age (44). Since finding your web site and reading the letters however, she has begun to dress me as her little 12 year old girl instead, insisting that it is much more humiliating for me to be a little girl rather than a grown woman (and she's right, too).
Mistress has taken to this new idea with great enthusiasm, and she has totally redone my "wardrobe".

I'm now made to wear petticoats instead of regular women's slips. Frilly, ruffled little girls' panties, instead of the satin or nylon panties I had become accustomed to. Training bra's instead of the Victoria's Secret designer bras she had made me wear in the past. Black Mary Janes, or black and white saddle shoes instead of my usual high heels. Pink ruffled little girl style party dresses instead of the stylish club wear she'd dressed me in before.

Besides the clothing, I now must wear my hair in childish pigtails with pink ribbons, and I must "act my age" whenever I am my mistress's "widdle girl", and stand up straight with my hands behind my back when I ask a question, and curtsey prettily when Mistress answers me. Mistress has also given me the name, "Dani" (my name is Daniel) as my girl's name. She has fun calling me Dani in front of our friends. For all they now, she's calling me "Danny", but Mistress and I both know she means, "Dani", her 12 year old little girl.

I was pretty well adjusted to wearing women's clothing, but now with all of the recent changes, I'm having a very difficult time accepting this form of humiliation and punishment. Mistress knew this would be hard for me, and she's having a wonderful time watching me squirm every time she begins to lay out my little girl clothes.

I'm sorry for the long email, but I did want to let you know how your web site has changed my life. Whether it was changed for the better or not remains to be seen.
Merry Christmas to you from Janice and me!

Dani

There was a letter published in the old correspondence magazine 'The Madame Journal of Personal Correspondence' Volume 2, entitled  'My "Little Girlie" Husband':

Dear Ms Candida,

I am 32 and married to a sweet young man of 25, whose role in the home is that of my little girl, Amanda Jane. Although I spoil and pamper him, I am also very strict and, like most mothers, believe in correction for naughty children. I always punish him in nursery fashion, across my lap, but with more than nursery sting, as a punishment should be painful, or there is no point to it.

I always start with my hand with 24 good smacks, on each buttock alternately, which results in a nice pink bottom. Next I administer 24 smacks with the hairbrush, again on alternate cheeks. Depending on how naughty he has been this may be the end of the spanking, and always results in a lovely red bottom and weeping and sobbing from Amanda Jane.

Following the spanking Amanda Jane has to stand facing the corner, knickers down and holding up his skirts for half an hour. This gives him time to reflect on his spanking and the reason for it.

I think terminology is important with regard to clothes. 'Mummy' wears dresses, aprons, slips (occasionally), and panties, while Amanda Jane wears frocks, pinafores, petticoats, and knickers or bloomers.

I must close now, and look forward to many more letters and stories about little girlie husbands.

Ms Jennifer
Rickmansworth

It is the point about terminology which is of interest. I do agree that in the case of 'little girl' petticoating especially, the terminology is very important, and Janice appreciates this. I send her my best regards, and congratulate her on her success with husband management.
Susan